Subject: business in violation .-
naive or disingenuous, those who believed or considered the 'Entrepreneurship Modena, or part of liege rules and legality. Illusion. "Parolai Trombones and" wanted to pass the idea that all the complaints of dishonest companies by the Department of Labor does not licked Modena.
We, accustomed to read the reality, even if "conditioned" by our ideal vision of the world and man, we were not surprised about the irregularity of the data business in 2009, provided to the press by the local Labour . No wonder those who hypocritically pretending to be surprised: associations, politicians, administrators and ordinary people, all of the increase surprised significant violations found in the Modena area.
The numbers speak for limited inspections of 1476 companies. Well over 2008, the increase in non-regular recruitment has risen by 61%, undeclared work has increased by 4% contribution evasion, social security and welfare has increased by 110%, for a trifle of 7m and 600 thousand euros, and finally increased by 110% of companies blocked, for a total of 101.
before a clear picture so we can not understand those who insist on marrying the cause of business support. There is no initiative, no concrete action to curb the rampant amount of violations, except the usual intent sterile conference facade.
Let's face it, the economic benefits the business they have always obtained, but then bring to bear the burden on workers of all crises. He blames the high cost of labor, but that does not justify tax evasion and violations, moreover, is justified by the cost of labor migration of production abroad. The reality is viewed critically in front of a painting as significant irregularities.
How to combine, or justify evasion with labor costs? The eminent economists, professoroni to cry, the labor lawyers, trade unionists of the meeting, the holders of political absolutes, should explain what are all garnered financial support, contractual and financial dished out by the handful of companies in the world. That it produced for young people, workers, Pensioners, casual squandering billions invested in thousands of companies.
recall agreements for hiring youth to near-zero cost to the companies, eased, among other things, the burden of contributions, temporary work, job insecurity as a rule, the hourly wages that are down to 5 / 6 Euro per hour. Do not forget the failure of the TFR for investment scam union among the shareholders and the invitation to do so!
thank all those politicians who still cry for rescue of banks and companies, such as the FIAT? And the so-called friends of the opposition to the government have left in the hands of the right of young workers' protection ? In our conviction that the Marxist left, do not we catch a glimpse of anything positive for the working classes in a policy that wants to be called reformist pole isfactory (take care not to call them friends), as if the reforms must weigh only and always on the lower and middle layers of society.
E 'absolutely unacceptable to continue a policy of support for a class that has never lost a cent. In the restructuring, in times of crisis and seeking investment from the state, but, thank goodness, the private sector invests its own private or public funds? And in Italy, as a large media company has not benefited, in difficult times, more public funds? So we say, but this is capitalism or we tell stories? Now we also explain why you want to beatify Craxi, all running on the bandwagon, that all of the bosses and to cheer the poor Bettino! But where was the good Veltroni at the time of a coin?
What we want to reiterate is that we must march on a line of big checks and that points to hit, caused by acts, who shamefully escapes and collects public money and takes in black. Really need to ask why the standard of living in relation to the allegations, otherwise how will we explain to our children who pay to be honest. They respond to us with TOTO ': we make the MA-PLEASURE! -
Thanks for any hospitality, warm greetings
Lino Andreozzi
primary school teacher
path of solidarity ', 28 - Castelfranco E.
Castelfranco, 04/02/2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment